<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eatologies &#187; How Stuff Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eatologies.com/category/how-stuff-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eatologies.com</link>
	<description>eating journal and scientific exercise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beet Cake Pictures!</title>
		<link>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/05/13/beet-cake-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/05/13/beet-cake-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curiosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How Stuff Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dessert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatologies.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SarahR made Beet Cupcakes! Camera phone pictures clearly demonstrate that though beet cake batter is pepto-bismol purple/pink (!) and beet cake is not red. Batter is purple/pink: Baked cakes are brown: All iced up: Recipe review, via Gchat: 5:59 PM me: were the muffins yummy? 6:16 PM Sarah: fine&#8211;i prefer carrot cake, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SarahR made <a href="http://find.myrecipes.com/recipes/recipefinder.dyn?action=displayRecipe&amp;recipe_id=665202">Beet Cupcakes</a>!</p>
<p>Camera phone pictures clearly demonstrate that though beet cake batter is pepto-bismol purple/pink (!) and <a href="http://www.eatologies.com/?p=143">beet cake is not red</a>.</p>
<p>Batter is purple/pink:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-150" title="Purple beet cake batter" src="http://www.eatologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/beetcake_purple-300x225.jpg" alt="Purple beet cake batter" width="300" height="225" /></p>
<p>Baked cakes are brown:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-151" title="Beet cake brown once baked" src="http://www.eatologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/beetcake_baked-300x225.jpg" alt="Beet cake brown once baked" width="300" height="225" /></p>
<p>All iced up:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-152" title="Beet cake all iced up" src="http://www.eatologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/beetcake_allpretty-300x225.jpg" alt="Beet cake all iced up" width="300" height="225" /></p>
<p>Recipe review, via Gchat:</p>
<blockquote><p>5:59 PM me: were the muffins yummy?<br />
6:16 PM Sarah: fine&#8211;i prefer carrot cake, though.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/05/13/beet-cake-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curiousity: Can you deep fry with butter?</title>
		<link>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/03/23/curiousity-can-you-deep-fry-with-butter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/03/23/curiousity-can-you-deep-fry-with-butter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curiosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How Stuff Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarified butter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep frying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatologies.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Can you deep fry with butter? Ignore for a moment whether you&#8217;d personally want to.  It just seems like something that would be trendy if possible.  Maybe pre-recession trendy, cause that much butter isn&#8217;t cheap, but trendy along high meets low comfort food lines. Or something up Paula Deen&#8217;s alley. Answer: Whether you can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question:</strong> Can you deep fry with butter?</p>
<p>Ignore for a moment whether you&#8217;d personally want to.  It just seems like something that would be trendy if possible.  Maybe pre-recession trendy, cause that much butter isn&#8217;t cheap, but trendy along high meets low comfort food lines.  Or something up <a href="http://www.seriouseats.com/tags/Paula%20Deen%20Is%20Trying%20to%20Kill%20Us">Paula Deen&#8217;s</a> alley.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong></p>
<p>Whether you can deep fry with a fat is dependent on the <a href="http://www.cookingforengineers.com/article/50/Smoke-Points-of-Various-Fats">smoke point</a> &#8211; above which an fat/oil becomes unusable.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_frying">According to Wikipedia</a> and Google books version of <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=6Hbbf5WD1h4C&amp;pg=PA80&amp;lpg=PA80&amp;dq=butter+smoke+point&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=KzUawuoZl_&amp;sig=hNhAMLaZdfzY856uDZ1iwUoE94U&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=unDISd2HDJnlnQe88KCWAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=10&amp;ct=result#PPA81,M1">What Einstein told his cook</a>, deep frying requires fat at a temperature of 345–375 °F.  Without a lot of care, the temperature may reach 400 °F.</p>
<p>Regular butter, smoke point = 350 °F &#8211; no, too low<br />
Your average <a href="http://www.cookingforengineers.com/article/131/Clarified-Butter">clarified butter</a> (butter w/ milk solids removed), smoke point = around 400 °F &#8211; tempting fate<br />
<a href="http://www.food-india.com/ingredients/i001_i025/i007.htm">Ghee</a> (Indian clarified butter w/o any water), smoke point = 485 °F &#8211; deep fryable!</p>
<p>Other than cost, my best guess for why deep frying with ghee isn&#8217;t the rage is that a lot of the buttery taste is in the butter fat.  Ghee has a unique taste of its own though, would be interesting&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, in my research found the fantastic <a href="http://www.cookingforengineers.com/">Cooking for Engineers</a> website.  Worth checking out.</p>
<p>This book looks pretty interesting too:</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=transitty-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=0393011836&#038;md=10FE9736YVPPT7A0FBG2&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=000000&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/03/23/curiousity-can-you-deep-fry-with-butter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby Blues: Digestion</title>
		<link>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/22/baby-blues-digestion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/22/baby-blues-digestion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Stuff Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digestion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatologies.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll hold off on digestion for a while.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/comics/babyblues.html"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-63" title="baby_blues1" src="http://www.eatologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/baby_blues1.gif" alt="baby_blues1" width="532" height="260" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll hold off on digestion for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/22/baby-blues-digestion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taste with your mouth</title>
		<link>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/22/taste-with-your-mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/22/taste-with-your-mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Stuff Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tongue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatologies.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As The Flavor Bible describes it, taste is &#8220;what is perceived by the taste buds.&#8221;  In common use, &#8220;taste&#8221; also includes what is we perceive through our noses while eating, but we&#8217;ll start by just addressing taste in the mouth.  In the mouth, most taste buds are on the tongue (though taste buds have also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As The Flavor Bible describes it, taste is &#8220;what is perceived by the taste buds.&#8221;  In common use, &#8220;taste&#8221; also includes what is we perceive through our noses while eating, but we&#8217;ll start by just addressing taste in the mouth.  In the mouth, most taste buds are on the tongue (though taste buds have also been found <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/apl/soto/2002/00000122/A546s546/art00009?crawler=true">throughout the mouth</a>).  Taste buds are visible to the naked eye by using a mirror and sticking out your tongue.  (They&#8217;re the little bumps.)</p>
<p>This is a diagram of the inside of a taste bud:</p>
<div id="attachment_49" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Taste_bud.svg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-49" title="709px-taste_budsvg" src="http://www.eatologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/709px-taste_budsvg-300x253.png" alt="709px-taste_budsvg" width="300" height="253" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">From Wikipedia Images</p></div>
<p>While food is in your mouth, it is broken down by chewing and saliva.  Some molecules find their way into the taste pore (labeled on the top of image).  <span id="more-25"></span>Once inside the pore, the molecules may be &#8220;detected&#8221; by one of the taste receptor cells (cells in center of image).  The receptor cells contains receptors which are known to detect 5 basic tastes: sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami (savory).  Each receptor cell only contains receptors for one basic taste but one taste bud may contain all five kinds of receptor cells.  Though some areas of the tongue are more sensitive to one basic taste than another, the common textbook image of a &#8220;tongue map&#8221; is false &#8211; sweet is not just on the tip of the tongue, sour is not just on the side, etc.</p>
<p><span id="ctl00_cColumn_ConditionCenter1_lblDetail"></span></p>
<p>Once a receptor cell detects enough of a basic taste, it sends a signal which travels through the afferent nerve (bottom of the image) to the <span id="ctl00_cColumn_ConditionCenter1_lblDetail">brain. </span>The signals tell the brain about the food we&#8217;ve ingested.  Sour helps us detect unripe and spoiled fruit, avoid tissue damage from acids, and maintain a balance between acids and bases.  Knowing how salty food is helps us to maintain our water and ion levels.    Umami indicates protein and peptides (like proteins but short).  Sweet indicates carbohydrates.  Bitter helps us identify toxic foods.  The reaction to these basic tastes is hard wired &#8211; <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11166078?ordinalpos=2&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum">infants during their first feeding smile at sweet and grimace at bitter</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Next:</strong> Each of the 5 basic tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/22/taste-with-your-mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution and why we cook</title>
		<link>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/17/evolution-and-why-we-cook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/17/evolution-and-why-we-cook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Stuff Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatologies.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week Wired wrote about Harvard primatologist Richard Wrangham&#8217;s talk at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting.  Dr. Wrangham spoke about the evolutionary advantages to cooking. In a numbered list: Kills parasites.  (Preventing us from getting sick.) Heat softens food making it less energy intensive to digest. (Less energy spent digesting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/02/cookinghumans.html">Wired wrote</a> about Harvard primatologist Richard Wrangham&#8217;s talk at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting.  Dr. Wrangham spoke about the evolutionary advantages to cooking.</p>
<p>In a numbered list:</p>
<ol>
<li>Kills parasites.  (Preventing us from getting sick.)</li>
<li>Heat softens food making it less energy intensive to digest. (Less energy spent digesting food is more energy for other things.)</li>
<li>Heat breaks down starch and protein which increases the body&#8217;s ability to digest them. (For the same amount of food, we get more starch/carbs and proteins cooked than raw.)</li>
</ol>
<p>Evolutionarily, when humans learned to control fire (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3670017.stm">up to 790,000 years ago</a>) and cook their food, eating became more energy/nutrient efficient (2 = less energy in and 3 = more energy/nutrients out).  This may well have played a big part in supporting the energy needs of the human brain, allowing us to evolve such big smart crazy connected brains (the accurate scientific phrasing clearly).</p>
<p>Related:</p>
<p>Book sized story from Dr. Wrangham available in June.  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465013627?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=eatologies-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0465013627">Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=eatologies-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0465013627" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/17/evolution-and-why-we-cook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking down the Experience of Eating</title>
		<link>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/16/the-experience-of-eating-components/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/16/the-experience-of-eating-components/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Stuff Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aroma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouthfeel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the flavor bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatologies.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To understand the experience of eating, one step is to define the components that go into that experience.  Karen Page and Andrew Dornenburg&#8217;s description of flavor in The Flavor Bible (highly recommended!) defines the components more elegantly than I could: FLAVOR = TASTE + MOUTHFEEL + AROMA + &#8220;THE X FACTOR&#8221; Taste = What is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To understand the experience of eating, one step is to define the components that go into that experience.  Karen Page and Andrew Dornenburg&#8217;s description of flavor in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316118400?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=eatologies-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0316118400">The Flavor Bible</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=eatologies-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0316118400" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> (highly recommended!) defines the components more elegantly than I could:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>FLAVOR = TASTE + MOUTHFEEL + AROMA + &#8220;THE X FACTOR&#8221;</strong><br />
<strong>Taste</strong> = What is perceived by the taste buds<br />
<strong>Mouthfeel</strong> &#8211; What is perceived by the rest of the mouth<br />
<strong>Aroma</strong> = What is perceived by the nose<br />
<strong>&#8220;The X Factor&#8221;</strong> = What is perceived by the other senses &#8212; plus the heart, mind, and spirit</p></blockquote>
<p>Scientific detail on each will follow in future posts, but the basics (summarized from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316118400?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=eatologies-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0316118400">The Flavor Bible</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=eatologies-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0316118400" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> and coursework):</p>
<p><strong>Taste</strong> happens in the mouth, primarily on the tongue.  The taste buds have 5 kinds of sensors (called receptors) which sense sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami (savory).</p>
<p><strong>Mouthfeel</strong> happens in the mouth.  Exactly as the name implies, it&#8217;s feeling (or touching) with our mouths, just like we feel with our hands, feet, etc.  The sensation include temperature, texture, piquancy (or spicyness), and astringency (causing puckering).<span id="more-8"></span></p>
<p><strong>Aroma</strong> happens in the nose.  The &#8220;scent&#8221; of food travels up through the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasal_cavity">nasal cavity</a> to the nose.  The nose has about 350 kinds of receptors that detect different odarant molecules.  Without smell, you only get sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami and all the rest of the delicious &#8220;chemical&#8221; details, are sensed by these receptors.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;The X Factor&#8217;</strong> happens everywhere else.  It is our internal state of mind when eating (happy, starving, exhausted), how the dish looks (disgusting, tasty, ridiculous), the people around us, what memories the food inpires, etc.  &#8216;The X Factor&#8217; is why on a sunny day after a pick-up soccer game at summer camp, a warm and soggy thin ham and American cheese sandwich can taste incredible.</p>
<p>Mentioned in this post:</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=eatologies-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=0316118400&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=000000&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eatologies.com/2009/02/16/the-experience-of-eating-components/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

